THE FUNDAMENTALIST OBJECTION

To Fundamentalists Purgatory is another “invention” of the Catholic Church, for they claim that neither the word nor the doctrine is found in the pages of the Bible. Since the doctrine of Purgatory is biblically unfounded, it follows that the Catholic practice of praying for the dead is superstitious.

 

THE CATHOLIC ANSWER

The fundamentalist objection has two interrelated parts: (1) The first refers to doctrine: is there a Purgatory? are we to believe in a Purgatory? and (2) The second refers to practice: may we pray for the dead or is this superstition? does praying for the dead make sense? The second part depends of the first: if there is a Purgatory, then praying for the dead is perfectly reasonable.

 

1. THE TERM “PURGATORY”

At the very outset we must question the fundamentalist objection, that “we cannot find the word ‘Purgatory’ anywhere in the Bible.” Just because a. term is not found in the Bible does not mean that we are to reject the truth conveyed by that term. For example, the terms “Trinity” and “Incarnation” and “Bible” are not found in the Bible, and yet fundamentalists most certainly hold the truths which these terms convey.

 

We are not discussing here about “terms,” but about “truths.” It is true that the term “Purgatory” is not found in the Bible but was coined later on in the history of the Church. But this does not mean that the truth that the Catholic Church teaches when it uses the term “Purgatory” is not found in the Bible. As we shall see, the truth conveyed by the term is taught in the Bible.

 

2. THE NEW TESTAMENT EXPLICITLY SPEAKS OF TWO STATES: HEAVEN AND HELL

 

The New Testament clearly and explicitly speaks of the states of Heaven and Hell, either of which is a person’s final destination after life on earth.

 

(1) General Judgment: Heaven (eternal glory with God) or Hell (eternal torment without God) are the ultimate states of men and women after what is called the “general judgment.” The majority of references in the New Testament concern the general judgment which will take place at the end of the world with the glorious manifestation of Jesus Christ:. For example, consider these parables all in Matthew’s Gospel: the wheat and the weeds (13:24—30), the net with good and bad fish (13:47—50),’the marriage feast (22:1—14), the wicked servant (24:45—51), the ten bridesmaids (25:1—13), the talents (25:14—30), the sheep and the goats (25:31—46).

 

(2) Particular Judgment: What about those who die before the end of the world? Do they have to wait in “suspended animation” until the general judgment? No. Because there is a judgment that comes immediately after death — this is called the “particular judgment.” Hence, according to Christian belief, reincarnation is surely excluded.

* Lk 16:19—31 — The rich man and Lazarus were judged immediately after their death: one went to hell, the other to heaven.

* Heb 9:27 — “It is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment” (Heb 9:27).

We are judged instantly and receive our reward, for good or ill.  As a result of the particular  judgement, we know at once what our final destiny will be : for Heaven or for Hell

 

3. THE NEW TESTAMENT IMPLICITLY SPEAKS OF A THIRD STATE: PURGATORY

 

3.1. Between the Particular and the General Judgments

From what has been said above, after the particular judgment a person may go to Heaven, if he is completely fit for heaven, or to Hell, if he is completely unfit for Heaven. But what happens to those who are not completely fit for Heaven? It is here, between the particular and the general judgments, that the state of purgatory or purification becomes very necessary. Does the New Testament refer to this third” state?

 

3.2. Scriptural basis

(1) Let us first consider two texts that are usually quoted in

Church documents to speak of Purgatory.

 

(a) 2.Maccabees 12:39—45

* This is the only scriptural passage to support — and that only indirectly — the doctrine of Purgatory; it refers to an intermediary state between blessedness and damnation.

In the battle against the Syrian forces led by Gorgias, Judas Maccaheus found that, contrary to the prescriptions of the law (cf.Deut 7:25), some of the Jewish soldiers who had died in the battle had been wearing pagan amulets (vv.39-40). Concluding that their death was a divine punishment, Judas made a collection among the survivors in order to have expiatory sacrifices offered for the dead in Jerusalem, that they might be freed from their sins (vv.41—43a).

 

The inspired author commends Judas’ action for it expressed both his faith in the resurrection (cf.2 Mac 12:43), and his conviction that the dead can be helped by the prayers and sacrifices of the living (cf.2 Mac 12:42— 44). The fallen soldiers are not damned since they expect the final resurrection (2 Mac 12:45), but they still stand in need of purification. ‘Therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they may be delivered from their sin.H This intermediary need for purification is substantially Purgatory.

 

In conversing with fundamentalists, Catholics must recognize the weakness and the strength of this text in justifying Purgatory,

- Weakness: Protestants and Fundamentalists refuse to admit the divine inspiration of 1-2 Maccabees, And so they reject the value of 2 Mac 12:39-45.

- Strength: Even if we concede to the Protestants/Fundamentalists the non-inspired value of the text, the text still has a historical value, It reveals that in the 2nd century B.C. there had arisen in Judaism the practice of praying for the dead, and that this practice was accepted and praised. Thus the state of Purgatory is implicitly or indirectly believed in. This practice of praying for the dead and the implicit belief in was accepted and continued by the Christian Church.

 

(b) 1 Cor 3:10-15

This is another text quoted in reference to Purgatory which has had a centuries-long tradition behind it. But today it is generally acknowledged that to derive the doctrine of Purgatory from this text is to arbitrarily distort Paul’s thought

 

The entire context deals with the quality of the work of God’s ministers. In verse 13 we note that:

* Paul is thinking only of the last day, not of any intermediary state beginning at death.

* It is not the persons of the ministers that are to be purified, but their work that is to be tested.

* Finally, the “fire” is not one of purification but rather one of discrimination; the fire will test the work of the ministers.

Vatican II speaks of Purgatory in passing, but significantly. after a quick reference to 2Mac 12:39-45, passes over 1 Cor 3:10-15 in silence. But 1 Cor 3:10-15 reappears in the “Catechism of the Catholic Church.”

 

(2) Other texts that indirectly refer to Purgatory

(a) Mt 12:32 — When speaking of the unforgivable sin, Jesus said: “whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come” (Mt 12:32). Though Jesus does not say so expressly, it would appear that there are sins, not against the Holy Spirit, which can be forgiven in the next life.

“As for certain lesser faults, we must believe that, before the Final Judgment, there is a purifying fire. He who is truth says that whoever utters blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will be pardoned neither in this age nor in the age of come. From this sentence we understand that certain offenses can be forgiven in this age, but certain others in the age to come” (St.Gregory the Great, 540- 604).

 

(b) Mt 5:26 — “Truly, I say to. you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.” This verse speaks Of expiation for sins committed. If this expiation is not fully satisfied in this life, then it will need to be in the next.

 

(c) Rev 21:27 — “Nothing unclean shall enter it (the heavenly city).” Jesus says, “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter; for by your words, you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned” (Mt 12:36-37). Who among us can expect to be so clean at the hour of death as to be able to go straight to heaven? Yes, through God’s mercy and the merits of Christ’s sacrifice, we must hope to die in the grace of God, repentant and forgiven of our sins; but how can we be sure of having expiated, with our repentance and acts of penance, for all our countless sins, even for our “idle” or “careless” words? God will not condemn us to hell for venial sins or slight faults (as our “idle” or “careless” words), but since “nothing unclean shall enter heaven,” there should be necessarily a place or state of “purification” (Purgatory) before going to heaven.

 

(3) Scriptural silence regarding praying for the dead

(a) The Scriptures are silent with regard to the practice of praying for the dead. But remember the general principle: just because some truth or practice is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible does not mean that it was not part of the Church’s belief and life.

(b) There are the several occasions when we would have expected the mention of such a practice but it is passed over in silence. Not surprisingly.

* InActs 12:1—5 James is put to death by Herod and Peter is imprisoned: the community prays for Peter who is alive, but not for James who is dead. There-was no need to pray for James, because he was a martyr and so was with God in glory.

* In 1 Thes 4:13—18 Paul is trying to console his Christians who grieve over the death of their loved ones, but there is not a word about praying for them. The ‘context is about their being present at the second coming of Jesus, not about their present state after death. Hence, the silence is understandable.

* Heb 12:1 follows ch.11. which speaks of the heroes of faith; they are with God. Hence, there is no need to pray for them.

* Heb 13:7 exhorts the readers to follow the example of their leaders. There is no reason to suppose that the leaders were dead; the whole context of ch.13 concerns the living. Hence, the question of praying for them does not arise.

 

The scriptural silence does not allow us to conclude one way or the other: either that the first century Church rejected or accepted the practice of praying for the dead.

 

(4) The following texts are not anti-Purgatory

The texts quoted by Fundamentalists do not prove anything against Purgatory.

(a) “It is better to be with Christ” (Phil 1:23) “at home with the Lord” (2 Cor 5:8). Certainly! That is why the souls in Purgatory are longing ardently to be in heaven, as soon as they are purified.

(b) Jn 5:24 gives us the word of Christ: ‘He who hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life.” Very true. That is why the souls in Purgatory, who are believers, are sure to go to heaven after their purification.

(c) “Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord ... they may rest from their labors” (Rev 14:13) refer clearly to those who die “in the Lord”, i.e. in God’s (sanctifying) grace, because they are sure of going to heaven, either immediately as the baptized infants or the martyrs, or after their purification in Purgatory; and so, in heaven they will surely “rest from their labors.”

 

4. CHURCH TRADITION

The scriptural testimony regarding Purgatory is admittedly meagre. Nevertheless, this tiny scriptural seed gradually developed into the doctrine of Purgatory from the 2nd century onwards.

Fundamentalists are fond of saying that the Catholic Church “invented” the doctrine of Purgatory, but they have trouble saying just when. Most professional anti-Catholics seem to place the blame on Pope Gregory the Great (A.D. 590-604). But belief in the doctrine of Purgatory and the practice of praying for the dead existed since the earliest period of the Church.

 

(1) The first three centuries:

(a) By the end of the 2nd century the Church began to pray not only TO the departed as to powerful intercessors before God, but also FOR the dead, for the Church is conscious that the efficacy of prayer transcends not only the barrier of space but also of time. From then on there are innumerable cases of the Church’s supplication to God for the departed, especially within the eucharistic celebration - precisely in keeping with the spirit of 2 Mac 12.

 

(b) The graffiti in the catacombs attest that the earliest Christians during the persecutions of the first three centuries, prayed for their dead. Indeed, some of the earliest non-inspired Christian writings, such as the “Act of Paul and Tecla” (2nd.c), refer to the Christian custom of praying for the dead, Such prayers would have been made only if Christians believed in purgatory, even if they did not use that name for it.

 

(2) The fourth century:

It is within this general, all-embracing atmosphere of praying for the dead that the explicit doctrine of Purgatory emerged.

(a)In the Church of the West, we have the witness of St.Augustine (354-430). He wrote that the final purification does not affect all men (Civitas Dei, 20.26,1); it takes place immediately after death (Civitas Dei 21.13); purgatorial fire is probably metaphorical or symbolic, not real (Civitas Dei 21.4).

 

We also recall that, in the 4th century, St.Monica, the mother of Augustine, asked her son to remember her soul in his Masses. This would have made no sense if she thought her soul could not be helped by prayers, if she thought there was no possibility of being somewhere other than heaven or hell.

 

(b) In the Church of the East, we have this moving testimony of St.John Chrysostom (between 344—406): “If it is a sinner that died, even then we should rejoice, for his sins have come to an end ... and as far as possible we should try to help him, not with our tears, but with our prayers, with our supplications ... and sacrificial offerings. For all these things have not been thought out with temerity. Nor we remember uselessly in the eucharistic mysteries those who have departed . . . These are not theatrical performance by any means: they are ordained by the Holy Spirit. Let us therefore help them and make their commemoration ... For w are all one body ... And it may well happen that with our prayers and offerings we shall obtain for them the total remission of their sins . .. Why do you mourn for them? Why do you weep and lament?” (John Chrysostom,”In Cor.Hom.” 41,4f: Patrologia Graeca 61,361).

 

The Church, in the West and in the East, conscious of the close bonds of union that knits its members into one body, into one “communion of saints,” prays for the living, prays to the dead, and prays for the dead. Thus, though the present practice of praying for the dead may not have direct and explicit New Testament basis, it is nevertheless a legitimate post—biblical development in harmony with Scripture.

 

(3) Why no contrary views? Early Church history teaches that Christians in the first centuries were prepared, quite literally, to take up arms, if anyone proposed a doctrine that was not believed by their ancestors. If the doctrine of purgatory was “invented” by the clergy, why has ecclesiastical history recorded no protest? There are no such protests by “true believers” in the postapostolic years complaining that purgatory was a novel doctrine. Christians must have understood that the oral teaching of the apostles, what Catholics call Tradition, and the Bible not only did not contracdict the doctrine but endorsed it.

 

(4) Development of two understandings of the nature of Purgatory

Given the scriptural silence with regard to the very existence of Purgatory, let alone its nature, it is not surprising that two different yet complementary understandings of the nature of Purgatory should have developed, in the Ea5t and in the West, both legitimate, but both also partial and one-sided, if taken in isolation.

 

(a) The West: Juridicial understanding (based on God’s Justice) The western understanding of Purgatory, following Peter Lombard, made a distinction between sin proper and the punishment (satisfaction and expiation) for sin.

* Even when sin itself has been forgiven, there is the punishment for sin that must be undergone in order that the requirements of justice be fulfilled (e.g. the penalty in civil or criminal cases). Man must atone for his sin, for this is strictly demanded by divine justice.

* Thus, God is presented as a stern judge who demands satisfaction from sinful men, either in this life or in the next.

The western understanding of Purgatory is therefore juridical, centred both on the serious reality of man’s sin and on the strict demands of God’s justice. Man must simply pay for his past sinful deeds. He does this in Purgatory.

 

(b) The East: Mystical understanding (based on God’s Love) The eastern understanding did not make a distinction between sin proper and punishment for sin. The focus was not so much on sin as on the person of the sinner; not so much on God’s justice as on God’s love.

* The sanctity of God will not stand for the slightest stain of sin that adheres to a person. For only the pure can enter into full communion with God.

* Purgatory is conceived as a process of purification and maturation. Purgatory is the final stage of spiritual growth, the moment when man reaches a state of maturation and perfection that he had not achieved in life. It is the final cleansing of a man before his eventual union with God.

This conception of Purgatory is far less juridical than that of the West; it is more internal, more spiritual and mystical.

 

Concluding observations:

(a) The Western and the Eastern understandings of Purgatory, though different, are legitimate. They agree on two important features regarding the doctrine of purgatory:

* Both are sober in their conception of the nature of Purgatory.

* Both insist on the usefulness of prayers for the dead.

(b) Both features — expiation and purification — have been accepted into the official teaching of the Church.

(c) Our understanding of Purgatory has been shaped more by the Western understanding than by the Eastern understanding.

(d) It would appear that the Eastern approach agrees better with the biblical mentality and is likely to be more appealing to modern man than the somewhat harsh Western approach.

 

5. CHURCH TEACHING

(1) The Council of Florence (1439)

In its Decree for the Greeks (DS:13O4), this Council tried to strike a careful balance between the Western concept of satisfaction and expiation (juridical) and the Eastern emphasis on purification (mystical).. Out of consideration for the Orientals, the Council deliberately omitted all mention of purgatorial fire, and instead spoke of “purgatorial sufferings.” Further, there is no mention of purgatory as a place. [Earlier, the same teaching was given by the Second Council of Lyons in 1274, DS:856].

 

(2) The Council of Trent (1563)

In 1524 Martin Luther rejected the practice of praying for the dead and the doctrine of Purgatory, and in the following years he was followed by the other Reformers. In response to the position of the Reformers, the Council of Trent, in its “Decree on Purgatory” issued in its 25th Session (1563), declared:

“The Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Spirit and in accordance with sacred Scripture and the ancient Tradition of the Fathers, has taught in the holy Councils and most recently in this ecumenical Council

* that there is a purgatory, and

* that the souls detained there are helped by the acts of intercession (suffragia) of the faithful and especially by the acceptable sacrifice of the altar.

 

Therefore this holy Council commands the bishops to strive diligently that the sound doctrine of purgatory, handed down by the holy Fathers and the sacred Councils, be believed by the faithful and that it be adhered to, taught and preached everywhere.

But

* let the more difficult and subtle questions which do not make for edification and, for the most part, are not conducive to an increase of piety (cf.1 Tim 1:4), be excluded from the popular sermons to uneducated people.

* Likewise they should not permit opinions that are doubtful and tainted with error to be spread and exposed.

* As for those things that belong to the realm of curiosity superstition, or smack of dishonourable gain, they should forbid them as scandalous and injurious to the faithful” (ND,no.2310,pg,627).

This statement is notable for its sobriety. Though disciplinary rather than doctrinal in nature, it teaches the existence of Purgatory and the usefulness of praying for the dead, as belonging to the Catholic faith; but it remains silent as regards the nature of purgatory.

 

(3) The Second Vatican Council (1964)

We find the same sobriety in this Council’s teaching:

* “In full consciousness of this communion of the whole Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, the Church in its pilgrim members, from the very earliest days of the Christian religion, has honored with great respect the memory of the dead (cf. a great many inscriptions in the catacombs of Rome); and ‘because it is a holy and a wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from their sins’ (2 Mac 12:46), she offers her suffrages for them” (Dogmatic Constitution on the Church: no . 50 .1)

* “This sacred council accepts loyally the venerable faith of our ancestors in the living communion which exists between us and our brothers who are in the glory of heaven or who are yet being purified after their death . . .“ (no.51.1).

 

(4) The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)

Notable is the title given to this section in the Catechism:

“The Final Purification, or Purgatory.” The Catechism chose to speak of Purgatory in terms of purification.

 

1030: “All who die in God’s grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven.”

 

1031: “The Church gives the name Purgatory to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned. The Church formulated her doctrine of faith in Purgatory especially at the Councils of Florence and Trent. The tradition of the Church, by reference to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a cleansing fire (1 Cor 3:15; 1 Pet 1:7)”

 

1032: “This teaching also based on the practice of prayer for the dead, already mentioned in Sacred Scripture. ‘Therefore (Judas Maccabeus) made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin.’ From the beginning the Church has honored the memory of the dead and offered prayers in suffrage for them, above all the Eucharistic sacrifice, so that, thus purified, they may attain the beatific vision of God. The Church also commends almsgiving, indulgences and works of penance undertaken on behalf of the dead.

 

‘Let us help and commemorate them. If Job’s sons were purified by their father’s sacrifice, why would we doubt that our offerings for the dead bring them some consolation? Let us not hesitate to help those who have died and to offer ur prayers for them.’ (St.John Chrysostom).”

 

 

 

6. UNDERSTANDING “PURGATORY”

 

(1) A state of final purification and maturation

 

(a) Faith in Jesus Christ brings us eternal life (Jn 3:16).

Eternal life is communion with God -  the Father through the Son in the Holy Spirit - and communion with the Mystical Body of Christ (the Church).

 

Through faith we already begin to live this communion with God in his Church in this life. But this communion is never perfect. Ours is a continual struggle (cf.Gal 5:16—26) between life in “the flesh” (a self-centred existence) and life in “the Spirit” (a God-centred existence). We sin; we repent; we continually stand in need of purification; through this purification we grow/mature into the fullness of Christ.

 

Throughout our life on earth our encounters with God are so many purifying and maturing experiences. The moment of our death is the final of such encounters.

 

(b) Purification at death is necessary because nothing impure and unholy can enter into the heavenly Jerusalem (cf.Rev 21:27), can come into the presence of the thrice holy God (cf,Is 6:3-5), can share in the glory of God (cf.Ezek 1:28; 3:23). Throughout our life we have been involved in the process of purification and maturation, and when death finds us this process is not complete.

 

Purgatory is best understood as a process by which we are purged of our residual selfishness so that we can really become one with the God who is totally oriented to others, i.e. the self-giving God. Purgatory is the final purifying and maturing encounter with the glorified Christ at the moment of our death. This truth is expressed through the doctrine on Purgatory.

 

(2) Purification involves pain and suffering

(a) The Bible often witnesses to this truth: that the nearness of God is both consoling and frightening, it can produce simultaneously bliss and awe, love and fear, attraction and reverential withdrawal.

 

God is often spoken of in terms of “fire” in whose presence there is both joy and suffering:

* In the Old Testament: Moses (Ex 3:6); Elijah (1 Kgs 19:13); Daniel (Dan 7:9—10; 8:17—18); Ezekiel (Ezek 3:5).

* In the New Testament: The disciples at the transfiguration of Jesus (Mt 17:2,6); the visionary on the island of Patmos (Rev 1:12—17).

“Fire” is a good pictorial representation of the sort of encounter we shall have with the risen Lord at death. The “being of light” will appear before us in full splendour, loving and majestic, to confront us with our past life as judge and at the same time to burn away all the engrained egoism and selfishness that still clings to us. We shall thereby be purified, not only from all our sins, but also from our inner sinfulness, from that humiliating drag to sin, the pull of the flesh, all our earth—bound tendencies that will finally be burnt away. And in the process we shall grow, we shall finally attain “the stature of the fullness of Christ” (Eph 4:13). We shall be enveloped in the light radiating from th majestic risen Christ, and our last attachment to sin shall vanish like the morning mist vanishes 1n the splendour of the rising sun.

 

All crises of growth are painful, and, our very last crisis will be no.exception. All of us are covered by thick layers of egotism and self-centredness that prevent the fire of God’s love, lying beneath, to break through, This final break-through of God’s purifying and perfecting love is achieved at the cost of acute suffering and pain.

 

The kind of suffering associated with Purgatory, therefore, is not suffering inflicted upon us from the outside as a punishment for sin, (as in the Western understanding), but the intrinsic pain that we all feel when we are asked to surrender our ego-centred self so that the God-centred loving self may take its place. It is part of the process by which are called to die and rise with Christ.

 

(b) The intensity of the purification has been traditionally expressed through two concepts, which need to be rightly understood.

 

1. The “fire” of Purgatory: Following what has been said above, this “fire” is not to be understood literally. It is rather a symbolic way of speaking of the painful nature of the purifying encounter with the glorified Christ at the moment of death. This purifying encounter is like coming from out of the darkness into the brightness of the light of the. sun, into the light of the glorified Christ, The rays of the sun can be soothing as well as scorching; they can bring joy or produce pain, depending both on the strength of the sun and on the subjective constitution of the receiver,

 

2. The “duration” of Purgatory: The duration of the pains of purgatory is another symbolic way of speaking of the degree of intensity of suffering in each person’s purifying moment of death. How long does this process of purification and maturation last? We must remember that this takes place outside time as we know it. With death we pass outside time as we normally conceive it and consequently our quantitative concept of duration cannot be applied to the after-life. We cannot understand duration in terms of days and months and years. Symbolically, then, a “long” purgatory would mean very intense suffering, and a “short’ purgatory would signify a lesser degree of purifying suffering.

 

(3) Need to purify our understanding of Purgatory

Purgatory is not so much a place as a purifying and maturing encounter. In the imagery of the past, since medieval times, Purgatory was presented as a place similar to a torture chamber, a concentration camp, or a dentist’s room. For all practical purposes, Purgatory was Hell without its everlasting aspect (cf.Dante’s “Divine Comedy”).

 

Purgatory as a place of torture, with fire, flames, concrete and measurable duration, etc. is passed over in silence in the Church’s official teaching (See point 5 above). All further questions like the nature of purgatorial fire, its comparison with hell—fire, the manner it affects man, can be dismissed off as idle and superfluous. This is the popular domain in which imagination has in the past run riot, an area where a much greater sobriety is called for. Unfortunately the prudent sobriety of the official Church with regard to the doctrine of purgatory has not always been imitated by preachers and catechists who have not hesitated to supplement this cautious reserve of the Magisterium of the Church with colourful and wild figments of their imagination.

 

A restrained use of images may prove moderately useful but when an unbridled imagination “turns purgatory into a gigantic torture chamber, a cosmic concentration camp, in which hapless creatures are punished to an accompaniment of shrieks and groans, then we must affirm that it has overstepped the mark of what can be considered as legitimate and fallen into grotesque ingenuineness at the very least” (Boros, 1965:134)

 

7. ARE PRAYERS FOR THE DEAD STILL MEANINGFUL?

 

Why should we pray for the dead? If purgatory is reduced to a personal purifying encounter with Christ at the moment of death, and if, on the other hand, this purification takes place outside time as we normally conceive it, it would seem that prayers for the departed, addressed to God hours, days, and even years after their actual death, are perfectly useless, for by that time the departed have already completed their instantaneous purifying process. In other words, the prayers come too late. Does it make any sense to offer Masses for the dead one month or one year after their departure?

 

It does make sense for the following two reasons.

(1) The Communion of Saints

In a previous paper [“Praying to the Saints”] we have already recognized that the biblical doctrines of “Communion of Saints,” the “Mystical Body of Christ” and Christ’s triumph over death justify our praying for those believers who are still with us in this life (the saints on earth), and our praying to those who are with God in glory (the saints in heaven). The same three biblical doctrines justify our praying for those believers who are in the state of Purgatory.

 

What a consoling truth, to know that by the “communion of the saints” we are still united with our dear departed ones. During their life with us on earth they were supported by the prayers and the sacraments of the Church. Death has not ruptured our communion with them. To pray for the dead, especially through the Eucharist, expresses this continuing communion, solidarity and life in Jesus Christ, whether one does so yesterday, today, or tomorrow.

 

We can pray for the dead for wrong reasons. These wrong reasons are based on a false understanding of:

(a) God: namely, a God who cruelly punishes people in a place called Purgatory. Therefore, we hope with our prayers to appease this God, to cool his anger, that he may look upon our dear dead with mercy, and that he may release them from Purgatory.

(b) Purgatory: a purgatory that is conceived as an immense torture-chamber. Therefore, our love for our dear dead impels us to pray for them so that they can be released as soon as possible from the horrible torture they are undergoing.

 

Rather, we pray for the dead:

1. to express our communion with and love for them which crosses the boundary of death;

2. to express our confidence and trust in the love of God for our beloved dead which purifies them and draws them into communion with him for ever;

3. to express äür own desire to recommit ourselves to God in Jesus Christ, to be faithful to him till death, so that we shall all be united in the one communion of saints.

 

(2) The Eternal Now of God

We are tempted to project our own human condition into the afterlife and consequently to imagine that the afterlife is also affected by time. We are unable to imagine a mode of existence which is not measured in terms of time.

 

God lives in an eternal, timeless Now. For him there is no succession of time, no difference between yesterday and tomorrow (cf.2 Pet 3:8). So does the glorified Christ. With death, a person enters into a realm that is beyond time, and his final purification takes place in the presence of the glorified Christ who is timeless.

 

For God it matters little if our prayers for the departed are offered as the person is about to die, or is actually dying, or has already been dead for some time, for in all three cases the prayers are gathered up into the ever-present Now of God. It therefore makes no difference when they are offered, for from the viewpoint of God they are always seen as present. God’s foreknowledge sees them as present and thus they exercise a mysterious, yet real and efficacious influence in the dying man’s purgatorial process.

 

(3) Conclusion: Here the intuition of the Church is perfectly correct, for both in the East and in the West, she has firmly believed that the dead do benefit from the prayers of the living. We pray daily in the Eucharist: “Remember our brothers and sisters who have gore to their rest in the hope of rising again; bring them and all the departed into the light of your presence” (Second Eucharistic Prayer).

 

It might be wiser not to try to go beyond these sober, general statements, For just as God has revealed and the Church has constantly taught the usefulness of these prayers for the faithful departed, so also both God and the Church have kept silent about the concrete manner in which these prayers affect the person of the deceased and we might as well imitate this sobriety and respect the mystery. Any attempt to go beyond this would amount to fruitless speculation at the service of unchristian curiosity.